BSD
Brochos – 15a-b
Mar Cheshvan 30, 5787. 11/11/2026
Short notes on some of the topics.
1- We encountered a rather complicated גמרא, and suggested a sheet to allow one to be able to follow. The topic is saying קריאת שמע very quietly that he himself cannot hear it.
הַקּוֹרֵא אֶת שְׁמַע וְלֹא הִשְׁמִיעַ לְאָזְנוֹ, יָצָא. רִבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר: לֹא יָצָא.

Here is the bottom line: AR OC 62, 3.


2 – Our גמרא discusses מצוות and their ברכות. Even if the מצווה is דאורייתא , the ברכה requirement is דרבנן. [A big topic is whether there are exceptions to this general rule].
In general, if one performs a מצווה and does not say a ברכה, for whatever reason, he is יוצא.
Like eating מצה without saying על אכילת מצה.

Now, this rule applies also to the מצווה of שחיטה as you can see below. YD 19.

This הלכה is quite obvious since the general rule is that the ברכה is not מעכב.
So why would the Shulchan Aruch need to tell us here in הלכות שחיטה?
As the highlighted ט״ז shows, the answer ties back to the story we began discussing (once again) about that mysterious figure, אלדד הדני, who appeared in North Africa over 1,100 years ago.
See the links in last week’s Shiur Points.
One of the הלכות Eldad taught was that if someone performs שחיטה without a ברכה, the meat is פיגול, meaning טריף.

See here from the מרדכי at the beginning of מסכת חולין.

As we see from the מרדכי’s comments, this הלכה runs contrary our מסורה and we do not follow it at all.
This is why the שלחן ערוך needed to say:
![]()
3 – Now, how does this connect to our גמרא?
In the משנה it says that one must verbalize קריאת שמע. ‘Saying’ it במחשבה is insufficient.

There is, however, a מחלוקת about a קריאת שמע said so quietly that it could not be heard, and as mentioned above, the הלכה is that one is indeed יוצא.
The Gemara goes on to quote several Mishnayos and Beraisos about a deaf person who separated תרומה, a mitzvah that requires a ברכה. Since he cannot hear and therefore his ברכה is problematic, the question is whether his act is valid and the תרומה he separated takes effect.
4 – In the year תקכ”ט – 1768 someone asked the נודע ביהודה, the Rov of Prague , a question.
How could the הלכות of אלדד הדני say that שחיטה without a ברכה causes the שחיטה to be invalid, meaning that the animal is טריף?
The הלכה is that a mute who can’t speak can shecht as long as there is an adult watching him shecht the animal. Now if he can’t speak, he cannot make a bracha, so how can the שחיטה be kosher?
The נודע ביהודה responds: “I don’t know why you are asking me about the הלכות of אלדד הדני, when in fact all the פוסקים have dismissed them and do not take them seriously.”
As for the question itself, his answer is quite simple.
When the Mishnah says a mute person may perform שחיטה even though he cannot make a ברכה, that is because saying it is simply beyond his ability. Someone who is able to make the ברכה and chooses not to, however, shows himself to be a מומר לאותו דבר, someone suspect regarding that very matter, הלכות שחיטה. That is why, according to the הלכות of אלדד הדני, both he and his שחיטה would be disqualified.


5 – In conclusion, we discussed the following case:
The Mishnah also says that one should read קריאת שמע pronouncing the words very clearly.
Suppose someone is a Lubavitcher who was brought up to daven in נוסח האר״י with our type of הברה, the Lubavitch way of pronouncing the words: “Boruch,” not “Burich.”
He walks into a shul and is told that he may not daven at the עמוד unless he pronounces the words the way they do. Is he permitted to daven there using a different pronunciation?

6 –
We spoke about the famous חתם סופר, the Rav of Pressburg. He often quoted two of his teachers. One was Reb Pinchas Horowitz, a disciple of the Maggid of Mezritch, author of the famous ספרים – הפלאה and פנים יפות. The other was the great מקובל Reb Noson Adler.
We quoted a ספר relating that Reb Noson Adler of Frankfurt, who davened with the local Yekkish pronunciation, wanted to learn the Sephardic pronunciation. He invited Rabbi Chaim, the Rav of Izmir, to Frankfurt and studied with him for three years, until he could pronounce the words exactly as the ספרדים do. From then on, even when he davened at the עמוד, while the rest of the congregation did not pronounce the words that way, he davened with the Sephardic pronunciation!







































































